Type any public handle and the analyzer pulls the profile, totals the recent feed, computes the engagement rate, ranks the top posts and prints a 0–100 health score — all in the same card, no signup gate.

Identity, reach, engagement, mix, tone and cadence — the same six axes a paid analytics console charges to compute, here in one free card.
Avatar, full name, verified tick, business tag, follower count, following count and total posts — pulled the moment you hit Analyze.
Average likes plus comments across the recent feed, divided by followers, printed as a percentage with the math visible underneath.
Photo, carousel and video counts from the recent grid, plotted as a percentage bar so the dominant format jumps out at a glance.
The three highest-engagement posts in the recent window, ranked by likes plus comments, each with its own thumbnail and totals.
The most-used emoji and the most-used hashtag across the recent captions — a quick read of the profile's voice and topic anchor.
A 0–100 composite blending engagement, comment ratio, cadence and post mix — rewarding consistent reactions, real conversation and a balanced feed.
Snapshot any handle — followers, engagement, posting cadence, top post — in one panel.
Any public handle. Private accounts return only the public cover by Instagram’s design.
Followers, average likes and comments across last twelve posts, posting cadence, content-type mix, and the top post.
All six metrics land in one card, with the top post pinned at the top.
Identity, math, content mix and verdict — the analyzer lines up the four lenses an audit would normally need four separate tools to cover.
The dashboard opens with the avatar, the full display name, the verified tick, the business or creator tag and a three-cell row for followers, following and total posts. Skimming that header tells you whether the account is a one-person creator, a brand page or a follower-farmed shell account — before any engagement number even matters.

Most engagement-rate widgets print a single percentage and call it a day. This one prints the rate plus the two inputs the rate is built from — average likes per post and average comments per post — along with the like-to-comment ratio that tells you whether the audience is reacting or actually talking. Reading the inputs makes the percentage honest.

Every Instagram feed is a mix of photos, multi-image carousels and video reels — and that mix is the strongest single signal of what the algorithm is currently feeding the account. The post-mix block counts each type from the recent feed and prints both the integer count and the percentage bar, so you can spot a reel-heavy or carousel-heavy account instantly.

The Health Score on the right of the header is the verdict. It blends five inputs — engagement rate, like-to-comment ratio, posting cadence, post-mix balance and follower-base presence — into a single number you can hand a client or a manager without explaining five separate charts. The breakdown is printed underneath so the verdict is auditable, not magical.

An Instagram account audit is the answer to one question: is this profile actually working? Followers alone never settle that question — a million-follower account with three comments per post is in trouble, and a 4,000-follower account with thirty comments per post is on the way up. The audit settles it by looking at four things together: the size of the audience, how often the audience reacts, what the reactions look like, and how often the account posts.
This page does all four lookups in one shot. You paste a handle, the analyzer reads the public profile and the recent posts, and the dashboard prints the numbers the same way a paid analytics console would — only here it costs nothing and skips the login.
The engagement rate is the share of followers who reacted to an average recent post. Average likes plus average comments divided by followers. A 3% rate on a 100k account means roughly 3,000 reactions on a typical post — not three thousand views, three thousand actions.
Likes are cheap. Comments are expensive. A 200-to-1 ratio means the audience scrolls and double-taps; a 30-to-1 ratio means the audience is actually talking. The ratio tile separates passive reach from active community in a single number.
Cadence is the median gap between consecutive recent posts. An account posting every two days is feeding the algorithm; an account posting every three weeks is being demoted. The cadence tile prints the gap so you can match the verdict against your own posting plan.
Reach, ratio and cadence can all look fine while the feed is monocrop — ten reels in a row, or ten photos in a row. The mix block reveals whether the profile is using all three formats Instagram rewards. A balanced mix is the cheapest reach win an account can buy.
One handle in, seven analytical outputs out — the audit jobs that normally need a separate tool each.
Header pulls avatar, full name, verified, business and creator tags so you know what kind of account you're reading before the math begins.
The math is shown with its formula attached — rate, average likes, average comments and the like-to-comment ratio all in one row.
Photo, carousel and video counts from the recent feed plotted as integers and percentage bars in a single block.
The three highest-engagement posts in the recent window, ranked by likes plus comments, each with thumb and totals attached.
The most-used emoji and the most-used hashtag from the recent captions — tone and topic anchor surfaced in two pills.
Median gap between consecutive posts in days — tells you whether the account is feeding the algorithm or starving it.
A 0–100 Profile Health Score blends the five inputs above into one number you can hand to a client or a manager.
Six audit jobs, three columns — this free analyzer, the big paid analytics platforms, and the spreadsheet approach.
| This analyzer | Paid analytics platforms | Spreadsheet manual audit |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate on any public handle | Plan upgrade required | Hand-typed formulas |
| Top three posts ranked instantly | Built into pro tiers | Sort the export by hand |
| Photo / carousel / video mix bar | Often locked behind addon | Build the pivot table |
| Composite 0-100 health verdict | Sold as a separate report | You have to invent the scale |
| Login or signup needed | Account + connected profile | No login |
| Cost | Recurring monthly fee | Free, but slow as molasses |
Pre-meeting sanity checks on a candidate creator's real engagement and post mix — before paying for an in-depth report.
Vetting a shortlist of twenty handles in twenty minutes, ranking them by health score and forwarding the screenshots to the brand owner.
Tracking your own profile's health weekly, watching the cadence and mix scores improve as you ship a new content plan.
Reading competitor brand profiles before a launch — what mix is winning, which posts top the ranking, what hashtags anchor the niche.
Quick coursework or thesis snapshots — pulling consistent metrics across dozens of accounts without buying a paid platform seat.
Five clean stages between the input box and the verdict ring on screen.
Leading @ signs, instagram.com prefixes and trailing slashes are stripped before the request leaves the browser.
A single request hits the profile endpoint and returns the header fields plus up to twelve recent posts as JSON.
Engagement rate, averages, ratio, post mix, cadence, top three, caption tokens — all run in JavaScript on your device.
Engagement (40), comment ratio (15), cadence (20), mix balance (15) and follower base (10) sum into the 0–100 verdict.
The card paints in one go and the connection closes — no row written, no log keyed to you, no follow-up tracking.
“I run twelve creator handles through this every Monday morning. The health score column gives me a clean ranking for the partnerships shortlist without opening twelve tabs.”
“The like-to-comment ratio is the tile I always read first. Last week it caught a 480k account that had inflated likes and barely twenty comments per post — saved the client a full retainer.”
“I screenshot the top-three-posts strip and paste it straight into our content meeting deck. It's the fastest way to show the team what's actually working on a competitor right now.”
Six analytics tiles, a top-three strip and a 0–100 verdict ring. Computed live, free, no login.
Ran my agency client through this and got a growth audit better than the one our paid SaaS gives. Engagement breakdown was specific to follower tier — not generic.
The score against follower-tier benchmark is genuinely insightful. Told me my engagement was below mid-tier average even though it looked OK in absolute numbers. Wake-up call.
Influencer vetting in 90 seconds. Used to take me an hour with spreadsheets. The "content quality" score is the part that matters most for collabs.
Great breakdown. Would love a "compare two accounts side by side" mode but for single accounts it is excellent.
Showed me my real engagement rate compared to similar-sized accounts in my niche. Sobering. Helped me re-strategize my content calendar that week.
I screenshot the analyzer output and send it to clients during sales calls. The visual breakdown sells the consultancy basically.
Detailed breakdown across content quality, engagement, and growth — exactly what I want for client audits. Would love a side-by-side compare two accounts mode, but the single-account view is already excellent.
The content quality score caught that I was posting 60% of the same type of post. Diversified after the audit, saw improvement within weeks.
Vetted a fitness influencer for a sponsored partnership. The engagement quality score flagged a likely bot-spike from last August. Saved us $3k.
Detailed and free. The closest comparable tool I know charges $40/month for less. Bonkers value.
Audit was thorough. The "recommendations" section was a bit generic but the data itself was useful.
Use this as my monthly mirror for my own brand account. Tracking the score over time helps me see what content moves the needle.