Drop any public handle. The page reads followers and engagement, runs the CPM formula and the tiered sponsorship band side by side, and prints per-post, per-week, per-month and per-year earning windows.

Drop a handle, get the realistic dollar window a sponsor would pay for a single feed post at that account's reach and engagement level.
We read the twelve most recent public posts, average the likes and comments, and divide by follower count to get the engagement rate the formula uses.
Both the CPM-style multiplier and the tiered band model are printed in plain text under the result, so no number feels like a black box.
Pick the closest category and the calculator weights the output, because a B2B finance audience is not paid the same as a meme dump account.
Type follower count and engagement percentage by hand for new accounts, or to run hypothetical scenarios before you grow.
The same result panel projects sustained income at a realistic posting cadence, not a flat twelve-times-per-month dream.
Every result on this page is the output of a published method. The CPM-style formula multiplies followers by engagement against a niche weight. The tiered band fits the same account against the historical price brackets sponsorship marketplaces have been paying. Both are printed under the result so you can defend the number in a brand conversation.

A 12k account at 8 percent engagement reaches more buyers than a 200k account at 0.4 percent. The math here weights engagement heavily so a small loyal audience actually earns more per post than a bloated one. This is the same logic real brand-deal negotiators apply when they push back on a quote.

Finance, B2B SaaS and luxury watches pay sponsorship rates that are nearly double general lifestyle, because the buyer behind the click is worth more to the advertiser. Travel and beauty sit slightly above the baseline. Personal blogs and meme accounts sit below. Pick the bucket that matches the brands you actually want, and the per-post band shifts accordingly.

A working creator does not run a paid slot every seven days for fifty-two weeks. The yearly figure on the result card applies a cadence factor of around three sponsored placements a month plus seasonal smoothing, so the per-year band looks like a calendar a human would actually keep. Pure twelve-times-the-monthly numbers are the kind of math that makes a sponsor laugh.

Brands pay a creator to put a product in a feed post, a story frame or a reel. The price is negotiated, not fixed. This page gives you a defensible opening band so you do not undercharge.
A 30k account whose audience comments and saves out-earns a 300k account whose audience scrolls past. The calculator weights engagement so the realistic number reflects attention, not vanity.
Sponsorship marketplaces publish historical price ranges by follower size. The calculator fits your account against those ranges, then displays the band that fits your tier.
Not a contract, not an invoice generator. Treat the band as an opening range you can defend with engagement screenshots and audience demographics in front of a brand.
The headline dollar range a brand would quote you for one feed placement at your reach and engagement.
What a realistic single-slot week brings in, before tax, before agency cut, before usage rights.
What three to four paid placements a month look like at your current tier and niche multiplier.
Twelve months of realistic creator income, smoothed for quiet weeks and launch spikes.
Pick the category and the calculator scales the band, because a finance creator and a travel creator do not earn the same per follower.
Shows the average likes, average comments and computed rate so you can defend the number to a sponsor.
No handle needed. Type a follower count and engagement percentage by hand to plan growth or pitch hypothetical brand deals.
| What you actually want to do | Paid platforms / guessing | This calculator |
|---|---|---|
| See a defensible per-post band in under five seconds | Subscription gate | Free, instant |
| Shows the formula and the multiplier openly | Black box | Printed under the result |
| Works on any public handle without an account | Sign-up required | No login |
| Manual entry mode for new or hypothetical accounts | Locked to scraped data | Manual mode toggle |
| Yearly figure reflects a realistic posting calendar | Flat 12x monthly | Cadence-smoothed |
| Cost | Two to five hundred a month | Free, forever |
A defensible opening band beats guessing low. The page gives you a number that matches what brands have been paying accounts your size.
Paste a creator handle, get the band, decide whether the rate card they sent over is in line with industry math.
Before sending a paid brief, run the candidate through the calculator so the budget request looks reasonable on both sides.
Teach a real-world demo of how brand-deal math works without forcing students to install spreadsheets or pay for a paid platform.
Quick, repeatable, methodology-printed numbers for stories about influencer pay, instead of single anecdotes that read as cherry-picked.
Five clean stages between your search box and the earnings card.
Default mode sends the handle to the public profile endpoint. Manual mode skips that step entirely and feeds the calculator from your inputs.
Follower count, recent posts, likes and comments come back as plain JSON. No login of yours is attached to the call.
Likes plus comments across the last twelve posts, divided by followers. The math runs in your tab, not on a server we run.
CPM-style formula and the tiered sponsorship band evaluate side by side. The wider of the two becomes the displayed range.
Per-post, per-week, per-month, per-year bands plus the formula and the niche multiplier appear in the mc-result card.
“I quote rates ten times faster now. Brand DM lands, I paste their handle, the page tells me what my work is worth, I reply with a number that holds up.”
“We vet partnership requests for a small fashion label and this is the first calculator we trust. The CPM math and the tiered band are shown side by side so we can defend the offer.”
“Manual entry is what sold me. New account, no posts yet, I plug the projected numbers and the calculator gives me a sane opening band for our first sponsor pitch.”
Free, open formula, no signup. The calculator is built for creators sending their next rate card and managers vetting their next partnership.
Estimated my Instagram earnings before a pitch meeting and the brand offered me almost exactly what this tool projected. Confidence in numbers wins.
For a creator with 12k followers I expected the estimate to be low — it was realistic and matched what brands have actually paid me. No fluffed-up numbers.
Used this for client benchmarking — what should an account of X size charge? The tool gives a defensible range, not a single fake-precise number.
Estimates align with what I have seen in my niche. Would love a slider for engagement-rate adjustment to show how that lifts pay, but the baseline math is solid.
Talked an undervaluing client into raising her sponsored-post rate using this tool's output as a reference. Doubled what she was charging. Real impact.
Calculator factored in engagement quality, not just follower count. That made the estimate believable. Many other calculators just multiply followers by a number.
Good ballpark. Would love niche-specific multipliers (beauty pays more than gaming), but the general estimate is a useful anchor for any conversation.
Quick. Honest. Gave me a number range instead of a single inflated figure. Trustworthy in a space full of fake earnings calculators.
Used for my mom's small-business Instagram. Showed her she could realistically charge for partnerships. Helped her career.
No login. No "premium plan" hiding the result. Just the calculator output. That is rare in the influencer-tools space.
Cross-checked my own earnings against the estimate. The tool was within ~12% of actual. Close enough to be useful for planning.
Reasonable range. Would love the option to compare estimates across multiple platforms (IG + TikTok), but for IG alone this is the best free tool I have found.